RCR 171: All language constructs to return something useful

code should look like:

str=<<END

  class aaa<br />
  end<br />

END
klass = eval str
klass.new

class Klass end
returns Klass at the moment. for end, returns niln do..end returns.. wel, return, and def..end returns nil. BTW def..end should at least return a symbol of the method.. someone with an rcr please?

It's already been noted and should be taken care of in future. I don't know why they don't do ASAP. Its an easy fix w/ no back code breaking as far as I know. Perhaps they still debate symbol or method.

I agree, that as many constructs as possible return useful results. Just no good reason not to.