RCR 268: String.natcmp
Submitted by patsplat (Sun Aug 01 02:07:06 UTC 2004)
Abstract
>Natural Order String Comparison is a useful algorithm.
Problem
From >Martin Pool:
Computer string sorting algorithms generally don't order strings containing numbers in the same way that a human would do. Consider:
rfc1.txt
rfc2086.txt
rfc822.txt
It would be more friendly if the program listed the files as
rfc1.txt
rfc822.txt
rfc2086.txt
Filenames sort properly if people insert leading zeros, but they don't always do that.
Proposal
Incorporate >Alan Davies natcmp.rb into the String class.
Analysis
He has a free license. Is it free enough?
Implementation
- from
- natcmp.rb
- # Natural order comparison of two strings
- e.g. "my_prog_v1.1.0" < "my_prog_v1.2.0" < "my_prog_v1.10.0"
- which does not follow alphabetically
- # Based on Martin Pool's "Natural Order String Comparison" originally written in C
- # This implementation is Copyright (C) 2003 by Alan Davies
- <cs96and_AT_yahoo_DOT_co_DOT_uk>
- # This software is provided 'as-is', without any express or implied
- warranty. In no event will the authors be held liable for any damages
- arising from the use of this software.
- # Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any purpose,
- including commercial applications, and to alter it and redistribute it
- freely, subject to the following restrictions:
- # 1. The origin of this software must not be misrepresented; you must not
- claim that you wrote the original software. If you use this software
- in a product, an acknowledgment in the product documentation would be
- appreciated but is not required.
- 2. Altered source versions must be plainly marked as such, and must not be
- misrepresented as being the original software.
- 3. This notice may not be removed or altered from any source distribution.
class String
- 'Natural order' comparison of two strings
def String.natcmp(str1, str2, caseInsensitive=false)
str1, str2 = str1.dup, str2.dup
compareExpression = /^(\D*)(\d*)(.*)$/
if caseInsensitive
str1.downcase!
str2.downcase!
end
# Remove all whitespace
str1.gsub!(/\s*/, '')
str2.gsub!(/\s*/, '')
while (str1.length > 0) or (str2.length > 0) do
# Extract non-digits, digits and rest of string
str1 =~ compareExpression
chars1, num1, str1 = $1.dup, $2.dup, $3.dup
str2 =~ compareExpression
chars2, num2, str2 = $1.dup, $2.dup, $3.dup
# Compare the non-digits
case (chars1 <=> chars2)
when 0 # Non-digits are the same, compare the digits...
# If either number begins with a zero, then compare alphabetically,
# otherwise compare numerically
if (num1[0] != 48) and (num2[0] != 48)
num1, num2 = num1.to_i, num2.to_i
end
case (num1 <=> num2)
when -1 then return -1
when 1 then return 1
end
when -1 then return -1
when 1 then return 1
end # case
end # while
# Strings are naturally equal
return 0
end
end # class String

I'd prefer not see this in the standard String. Maybe as a loadable module it would be better, even if I never felt the need for this. You may like to specify a better "why this is needed and deserves to be in the core classes" , a simple 'is useful' is quite, well, too simple. --gabriele renzi
--
I linked to Martin Pool's web page for the abstract, because I thought the original author made the best case for this algorithm. Anyways, here goes:
- This is a useful sorting algorithm applicable to all String objects.
- It doesn't conflict with existing methods on String.
- Ruby's competition offers this feature.
- The motivation for this sorting algorithm fits the Ruby philosophy. The >php manual states: 'This function implements a comparison algorithm that orders alphanumeric strings in the way a human being would, this is described as a "natural ordering".'
That's pretty much the case for why I suggest it be on the core String class. If there is a maintenance issue, then having the above ruby script in the standard library would be fine, I'll take responsibility for maintaining it (unless original author disagrees, of course).
Cheers,
-- Patrick May
This would help everyone to make nicer, less annoying Ruby programs. I'd like it better as the standard sort method in String#<=>, though.
|
Strongly opposed |
0 |
Opposed |
0 |
Neutral |
0 |
In favor |
1 |
Strongly advocate |
3 |
|


RCRchive copyright © David Alan Black, 2003-2005.
Powered by .
I'd prefer not see this in the standard String. Maybe as a loadable module it would be better, even if I never felt the need for this. You may like to specify a better "why this is needed and deserves to be in the core classes" , a simple 'is useful' is quite, well, too simple. --gabriele renzi
--
I linked to Martin Pool's web page for the abstract, because I thought the original author made the best case for this algorithm. Anyways, here goes:
That's pretty much the case for why I suggest it be on the core String class. If there is a maintenance issue, then having the above ruby script in the standard library would be fine, I'll take responsibility for maintaining it (unless original author disagrees, of course).
Cheers,
-- Patrick May
This would help everyone to make nicer, less annoying Ruby programs. I'd like it better as the standard sort method in String#<=>, though.